Robert Poole's Journal|
[Most Recent Entries]
Below are the 20 most recent journal entries recorded in
Robert Poole's LiveJournal:
[ << Previous 20 ]
[ << Previous 20 ]
|Tuesday, March 10th, 2015|
|Another contender for universal disc spinner
I'm getting close to pulling the trigger on a new universal disc player to replace my aging (and dying) Denon DVD-2910. Really close. But just to be sure I wasn't overlooking another player that might satisfy even more than those I've already considered
, I dug around a bit more and found another possibility that intrigues me.
Cambridge Audio makes a universal disc player, the Azur 752BD
, which has the same basic video electronics and logic as the Oppo BDP-103 (including the same SoC, though with different firmware) but a heavily upgraded audio section like the Oppo BDP-105. No, the Azur 752BD doesn't have XLR balanced outputs, but it does have a set of five (5) Wolfson DACs and upsamples almost everything to 192k/24. They're “only” 24-bit DACs, unlike the Sabre32 DACs built into the Oppo BDP-105, but realistically you'd be hard pressed to tell a difference since much of the theoretical dynamic range is below the noise floor.
Reviewers are divided, but some are giving the slight edge to the Cambridge Audio offering over the BDP-105 in terms of sound quality. Upsampling is nice — I had an early Technics DVD-Audio player which upconverted CDs to 96/24, and they sounded pretty sweet. Wolfson DACs are highly regarded, though it's a mistake to put too much stock in any given manufacturer (since they all produce products to hit multiple price points). The 752BD doesn't have balanced XLR topology for its outputs, but most people don't run XLR at their homes unless they are doing long cable runs from source to amplifier; in any event, numerous tests have shown that XLR isn't really beneficial to a home setup, not even a hi-fi system.
Well, unless you like your source or amp to sound 6 dB hotter.
So what is bothering me about Cambridge Audio's flagship universal disc spinner? SACD support. Specifically, DSD support. The Azur 752BD plays SACD discs, sure, but it decimates the DSD down to PCM internally at about 88 kHz. It apparently also sends this PCM over HDMI instead of streaming DSD to the receiver. Considering that SACD is theoretically equivalent to 100 kHz PCM, the lower sample rate for conversion seems to be an artifact of the largest even divisor you can get away with using. See this thread
for more on how the 752BD actually converts DSD to PCM, and this article
for a discussion of why it makes no sense to just compare numbers of bits with DACs.
In summary, the Azur 752BD has a nice build quality, uses well-proven logic for its internals, is somewhere between Oppo's two current models in terms of price and features, and it supports all the formats I care about (including HDCD and SACD). It's missing a few features that the Oppo BDP-105D currently has, but it's also marginally cheaper — by $100.
Edit: The Azur 752BD also has thinner bass than the competition according to critics, which seems a little weird to me. Not quite as “exciting” sounding as some of the competition on movie soundtracks.
Still not sure what to do... Current Mood: intrigued
|Thursday, February 12th, 2015|
|An audiophile's conundrum
Admittedly a first-world problem, but I'm seeking advice. I'd been planning on replacing my aging Denon receiver with something a bit better sounding and with more HDMI inputs, but my universal disc player — a Denon DVD‑2910 — decided to take a crap on me now after almost a decade of faithful service.
Here's the rub. One of the reasons I bought the Denon was that, for their mid-price model, it supported every format in my collection at the time. That included HDCD, a relatively obscure format that provides a marginal sonic improvement over regular CD while still remaining backward compatible with conventional CD players. I have numerous discs in the format, including a beloved Dick Dale album and a complete set of Mannheim Steamroller's Fresh Aire
. The problem? Denon and Marantz don't include HDCD support in their latest offerings, meaning I need to look elsewhere for a universal disc player that is truly universal. And since it's 2015, I figure that has to include Blu-ray support this time around.
So far, here are the products I've found in my search that would satisfy, in increasing order of price (though not necessarily desirability). I'd be interested in hearing from folks about which they might prefer, so I'll try to include a poll below.( The contenders...Collapse )
So, the question is which will bring the most satisfaction for the money? For instance, I don't know if balanced outputs mean a whole lot to me, since I never used them on my old Rotel player… though it's never bad to have the option. What would you pick, knowing this is a piece of hardware that you would be hanging on to for the better part of a decade?
Which universal disc player would you pick?
If you have an alternate suggestion, please leave a comment! Current Mood: nerdy
|Thursday, December 18th, 2014|
|Thoughts on Ascension, episode 3
First off, apparently Ascension
was intended to be aired over 6 nights, but instead was aired as three 2-hour episodes. The third and final episode broadcast last night.
Like some other folks, I thought Ascension
was problematic from the get-go
, especially for the Shyamalan-esque bait-and-switch twist revealed in the first night (when we find out that the ship never left earth and is one giant sociological experiment). After watching the third and final night of the miniseries, I feel that whatever pretensions the show had at being hard science fiction were completely blown away.( Spoilers inside the cutCollapse )
This was supposed to be a return to SyFy's glory days, but I'm not seeing it. The miniseries had the smell of a pilot for a full series, but I don't think this show is deserving of any continuation, sorry to say. Current Mood: disappointed
|Tuesday, December 16th, 2014|
|Tuesday, October 28th, 2014|
|Controlling a PS4 via the TV remote
One of the things I liked about my PS3 is the availability of the Blu-ray remote control, which I own. Designed as a Bluetooth device, it synced with the PS3 just like any other controller and required no line-of-sight to work.
Sadly, there's no official media remote for the PS4. However, there's an HDMI standard called CEC
that allows control signals to be transmitted from one device to another via an HDMI cable. This is one way to unify remote controls in a home theater, providing the components in question both support the standard.
As it turns out, my Sharp TV supports this standard under the name AquosLink™, and it's already turned on by default. All I needed to do was follow the instructions on this page
to enable the feature on my new PS4. (It's called “Device Link” in the PS4 menus.)
Within minutes, I was able to navigate the PS4 interface, start streaming movies I had purchased on the PS3, pause, resume, and stop, all from my Sharp TV's remote. Very impressive. This is a level of integration that makes up for the minor inconvenience of not having an officially supported media remote for the new system. Current Mood: accomplished
|Thursday, October 23rd, 2014|
|Groovy each() on Strings doesn't work as expected
I was trying to write some text cleaning utilities yesterday when I encountered an annoying limitation of Groovy's built-in methods, which it adds to some existing Java classes using the metaclass.
Groovy supplies an each()
method which takes a closure, allowing for iteration in a functional programming style. On a collection or array, each()
will iterate over each member and supply it to the closure as-is. But for String
supplies each character as its own String
of length 1. Not very efficient at all. At the very least, I would have expected a Character
, the wrapper for the char
Ultimately, I used an old-fashioned for loop and String.charAt()
to do the work, which isn't very idiomatic Groovy but at least works well. As it turns out, someone had researched the various ways to iterate over a String and compared the performance of each — check it out here
. Turns out that charAt()
isn't too bad, and avoids a defensive copy that is performed by toCharArray()
Another discovery: In Java, if I have a Set
values and have an integer I want to check against the container using contains
, Java seems to do the right thing with type coercion. In Groovy, no type coercion seems to happen — pretty frustrating for a dynamic language. Very annoying since most of the constants defined on Character
primitives, but Character.getType()
returns an int
. Current Mood: disappointed
|Monday, September 15th, 2014|
|Embedding content from Upworthy doesn't seem to work
Just tried embedding a link to audio of an interview with Bill Nye hosted on this site
, but apparently LiveJournal insists on mangling/excising the embed code, leaving me with empty <lj-embed> tags. Kind of useless.
The embedding for YouTube videos seems to work fine, and uses iframes just like Upworthy's embed codes do.
At any rate, check out the link and listen to Bill Nye! Current Mood: frustrated
|Tuesday, July 8th, 2014|
|Grails data binding sucks
Grails has an elegant way of handling parameters passed from web forms: command objects. There are certainly other ways to pass parameters back and forth between the view and the controller (and Grails exposes a params object implicitly to all controller methods), but if you need everything contained in a single object for convenience, command objects are the way to go. You can even do some things with them that you can do with domain objects, such as constraints and custom validation logic. (Just don't declare fields with def, because apparently the binding only works on typed fields...)
However, I'm starting to learn that there are vexing problems with Grails data binding, problems for which the solution is not obvious. For example, say I create a command object Foo with a field named abc of type String. I have a save method in my controller, Bar, which takes an explicit argument of type Foo. Grails is supposed to take all the parameters passed in through the request and bind them to the same-named fields in the command object.
So today, as I'm writing code, I got a stack trace looking like the following:groovy.lang.MissingPropertyException: No such property: abc for class: blah.Foo
Possible solutions: abc
That's right, folks. Grails claims that the field does not exist, and then tells you to use the same damned field it just told you didn't exist. So much for custom validation logic, since the exception is being thrown within one of my validators. (I'm actually working with passwords, so the idea was to put a custom validator on the “repeat password” field which ensures that the user typed the same password both times. A ValidationException should be thrown if the fields are different.)
I really am not sure what's causing this problem, because we have other code where binding works fine, but I seem to always trip over corner cases like this.
Update: I was able to work around the problem using a 2-arg version of the validator closure, and refraining from directly referencing fields in the object itself. (The second arg is a reference to the object instance being validated.) Current Mood: annoyed
|Thursday, May 1st, 2014|
|Does taking credit for destroying a startup company make you a jerk?
I happened upon an article on TechCrunch
by Milo Yiannopoulos with the provocative title, “How I Killed a Startup in 4 Hours (And Why I Don't Regret It).” There's an editor's note at the head of the article which notifies the reader that Yiannopoulos is a journalist and broadcaster, and that he will be publishing a book in 2015 titled The Sociopaths of Silicon Valley
. That should serve as a warning, and an indication of how this guy feels about technologists.
The short version: A startup called Personalpaper.me proposed to cull articles from various online sources and bundle them into a beautifully printed magazine-style format, mailed directly to your home. The per “issue” cost would be about $2, so not that cheap nor environmentally friendly, and the company proposed to strip out ads, which is how websites monetize articles. As Yiannopoulos rightly points out, there's the concern of copyright infringement, especially since the source sites were not being compensated, nor permissions obtained.
The problem is, Yiannopoulos is also overtly hostile to technology companies, and it really comes out in this article. He makes the basic mistake of conflating copyright infringement with theft: “In other words, its entire
business model is predicated on theft.” (His emphasis.) Of course, the problem is that it's being done by a third party and for-profit; there are plenty of applications and services out there that let you make local copies of articles on the web, and many of them even reformat the content and strip out ads, but all of those are for personal use, where fair use doctrine applies in the United States. (To give two examples, Amazon's Silk browser for the Kindle Fire tablets has a special article reading mode, and Evernote lets you snip just article contents on a page instead of the entire page using their Clipper plugin for browsers.)
Here's where I think Yiannopoulos goes off the rails:
The indifference — and occasional contempt — with which Silicon Valley treats content businesses is laughable and offensive. For all their talk of “changing the world” and focus on crafting cute interfaces, I can’t think of a single technology company in history that has made much of a lasting cultural contribution.
Really? Well, I suppose that depends on how you define culture and technology (or “technology company”). Without railroads, we wouldn't have had streetcars (also known as trolleys, or light rail in the modern age). Without streetcars, there would be no A Streetcar Named Desire
(not to mention numerous other railroad metaphors that seeped into English and other languages). The typewriter was one of the greatest enabling inventions for writers ever, replaced only in the latter half of the 20th
century by the personal computer. The automobile continues to be a fascination for many, and has influenced every factor of modern culture; automobiles are also frequently viewed as works of art in their own right, and justly so.
Computers and Computer Science have had a profound impact on modern culture too, even on mainstream purveyors of so-called “literary fiction” (a term I find elitist and offensive). Same for biosciences.
As an aside, if it seems that many technologists and other technology-savvy people are less than thrilled with current copyright protections of content, it's that copyright law has been abused to continuously lengthen the duration of copyright (effectively making it eternal) to the detriment of the public domain, and that not all content companies are equal. For every dozen small publishers or beleaguered newspapers out there, there is one large content company wielding outsize political and marketplace influence. I'm thinking of Disney as one major example, a company its detractors sometimes refer to as the Mouse Gestapo.
What startup can boast an influence on our intellectual history equal to The Divine Comedy, or Paradise Lost, or… well, you get the idea.
That's a pretty ridiculous comparison to make. First off, startup companies make up a newer, small and ephemeral fraction of all technology companies currently out there; if you want to villify an industry, you have to recognize this fact or you're just creating a straw man. Secondly, the two examples of literature he gave were old, outstanding examples of the literature of their time (think Sturgeon's Law
), and not very representative of the breadth of depth of even fine literature. His comment also underscores a certain prevailing snobbish attitude that the only literature worth studying is that written by old, dead white guys — the older and deader, the better — while simultaneously comparing high art with Wired
articles. It's disingenuous to say the least.
I'm not advocating for copyright infringement, though I have
advocated for saner copyright durations in the past. I believe that Personalpaper.me had a questionable business model (the unauthorized distribution aspect particularly bothered me), and should have vetted its product idea with lawyers before launching. That's expensive, and a legal hurdle that many garage startups can't make without VC money, but these guys apparently could have done that and didn't. But I don't think it's fair to turn around and tar the entirety of Silicon Valley and the rest of the tech world.
One last thing... the use of the term sociopath is very loaded, and I hope Yiannopoulos has a change of heart and chooses a different title for his upcoming book. First, the term is of dubious value in psychiatric circles. Second, the term is often misapplied to people on the autistic spectrum, and we know that Silicon Valley (and the tech industry at large) has quite a few high-functioning people on that spectrum. The difference is that sociopath has negative connotations, and implies intention to do harm. That's yellow journalism, in my not-so-humble opinion. Current Mood: surprised
|Monday, March 10th, 2014|
|Wolfram is at it again
It appears Stephen Wolfram is at it again, this time creating a language called (big surprise) the Wolfram Language
. Apparently, it's not enough to name almost all the company's other products after himself and
publish papers in journals that themselves are published by his own company...
The Slate article linked above spends a fair time trying
to be fair to Stephen Wolfram and his new language, although the author can't resist providing links to one of my favorite criticisms of Wolfram and his book, A New Kind of Science
It isn't long before David Auerbach starts to tell us what he really
But when Wolfram says that his language
knows about the world, it’s sleight of hand—no different from saying that the English language knows about the world because it happens to have words used in the world.
And even more telling, here's the money quote:
Bottling all this real-world data together with the language has another, more pernicious side effect. If I want to use a different knowledge base with Wolfram, or use Wolfram’s knowledge base with a different underlying language, I can’t do that unless Wolfram gives the go-ahead, because he has locked all the pieces together. Given Wolfram’s penchant for suppressive legal threats around intellectual property, I recommend against building anything in the Wolfram Language, lest Wolfram decide that he owns it.
Auerbach then likens Wolfram's hyperbolic claims about this language's knowledge of the world to what he calls inflated claims about artificial intelligence. Sadly, such claims have done much to damage the field of AI. He says:
The intellectual dishonesty in the presentation of the Wolfram Language, whether intentional or unintentional, disturbs me, as I’m sure it does many other computer science professionals.
He also calls it rehashed snake oil. Current Mood: amused
|Wednesday, February 26th, 2014|
|Sorry, I know it's been a while
I'm terribly sorry that I haven't written anything in here since October, but I've been awfully busy with work, life (including the insanity leading up to Further Confusion), and illness, in no particular order.
I feel especially bad since I promised someone at the fursuit parade (at FC in January) that I'd post photos of the parade here on this account, since I have taken many and this particular gentlefox was nice enough to set up a pose for me twice. (The first shot was crap. Not fast enough on the shutter release!)
Of course, it didn't help that I was sick during the entirety of Further Confusion, and for a couple weeks afterward. But that's just an excuse for procrastination. Current Mood: working
|Thursday, October 17th, 2013|
|Another reason why I want to throttle the jqGrid developers
Say you have a jqGrid and you want to operate on all the rows that are selected (assuming you've got it set up for multiselect). In fact, my code was doing this in order to bulk move items from one grid to another, but the important fact is that the items were being deleted from the source grid piecemeal.
To obtain the array of selected rows, you would use something like:var rowids = $('#foo').jqGrid('getGridParam', 'selarrrow');
This gives you an array that you can iterate over to operate on those selected rows. But what I noticed is that all but the last row seemed to be processed; further investigation showed that it was actually roughly half of the rows selected. Even worse, the $.each
utility function from jQuery was feeding 'undefined' values to the callback function. Say what?
Yep, it turns out that jqGrid doesn't hand you back an array you can just do with as you please. No, it actually hands you a reference to its own internal array which tracks these things. So as you delete items one by one from the grid, the array you're iterating over is shrinking, and your index will eventually point to nonexistent values.
The solution? Well, you can copy an array using Array.prototype.concat()
, which looks clunky but seems to work. I'm not sure if there's a better way out there that works across all major browsers.
But really, I don't think anyone should have to do something like this with a robust UI widget. Current Mood: nerdy
|Thursday, September 12th, 2013|
|Is English a Pidgin Language?
Today, a coworker of mine opined (rather forcefully) that English was a pidgin language. When pressed, he mentioned something about English being used in trade (true enough), and that English incorporates bits of other languages (also true). However, neither of these things makes English a pidgin by themselves. Yet the idea that English is a pidgin language persists, so much so that Google cheerfully suggests search strings like is english a pidgin language
when you start typing in such a query.
You'd think that, with such a common query, there would be more relevant results, but there really aren't. I managed to find this discussion
which started out as a discussion of the grammar of non-English dialects of England, Cumbria in this case. One of the participants says it thusly:
Nor is English a pidgin language — Modern English is derived via Middle English from Old English (Anglo-Saxon). It has been influenced by Old Norse — hardly surprising considering the political sway held by Scandinavians in Britain at one time and the more or less mutual intelligibility of the Old Norse and Old English languages. English vocabulary does borrow heavily from other languages but that is not unusual. Most of the basic ordinary words that are used in English can in fact be traced back to Anglo-Saxon.
By the way, the thread is also archived here
. The many auxiliary verbs in English seem to be a Norse/Viking borrowing; even German doesn't have an auxiliary for infinitive forms, whereas English does (e.g., “to be,” where to
is the auxiliary).
This seems to suggest that a language can't be a pidgin if it has a provenance, or a pedigree of some kind. But there are many forms of pidgin which have been around for centuries, long branched from their source languages, so that can't be the sole determining factor.
So what is the definition of pidgin? The dictionary says this
an auxiliary language that has come into existence through the attempts by the speakers of two different languages to communicate and that is primarily a simplified form of one of the languages, with a reduced vocabulary and grammatical structure and considerable variation in pronunciation.
An alternate definition adds:
Unlike creoles, pidgins do not constitute the mother tongue of any speech community
OK, now we're getting warmer. So as the official language of England and the primary language spoken throughout the UK, English would probably not be considered a pidgin.
The Wikipedia entry
largely reiterates these points, but also lists common traits
of pidgin languages, none of which mainstream English possesses.
What about potential flies in the ointment? If a pidgin is not the primary spoken language for a language group or speech community, and if a pidgin is typically learned as a second language (as the Wikipedia article suggests), what do we make of cases where Pidgin English (a pidgin form of English) is considered an official language of a country, e.g. Papua New Guinea? Even if it's an officially recognized language, it seems that Pidgin English is never the primary language of the country. (I'd be interested if someone comes up with a counterexample where any pidgin, regardless of source language, is the primary or only form of language in a given region. Would that magically make it a creole instead?)
Another question is whether you can generate a pidgin language from a pidgin language. If English is a pidgin language, what does that make Pidgin English?
So, what do you think? Are there any (preferably online) sources that actually answer the question definitively? If so, please share! I'd like to be able to speak authoritatively when this topic comes up again. Current Mood: curious
|Thursday, August 15th, 2013|
|Tough times for a grammar Nazi
For the record, I really despise the term “grammar Nazi” for several reasons, not the least of which is the gratuitous comparisons to a group of people responsible for some of the worst human rights violations of the 20th
That said, I was saddened to discover that many dictionaries are now including a new definition
. Specifically, this is the common (mis)use of the word as an intensifier that is almost the exact opposite meaning of the literal and, many would say, correct meaning. At least Dictionary.com only puts the “new” sense of the word in a usage note. Current Mood: sick
|Thursday, July 18th, 2013|
|Perhaps the best cheap ultrabook for coding
So you want a thin, ultraportable computer for doing a bit of creative writing or a bit of noodling with some code, but you don't want to spring for a MacBook Air? Sure, there are some options out there that will work nicely.
I'd dearly love to get my hands on a Samsung Series 9, but the cheapest I've seen is still very close to what you'd pay for a low-end MacBook Air. Newegg
do have pretty regular deals, and it was Amazon that happened to have the deal that worked the best for me. There were plenty of relatively cheap options, but this article at Coding Horror
convinced me to give the ASUS Zenbook series a closer look.
Since the goal was a cheap ultrabook that I could realistically code on, I didn't need the 1080p resolution or the pure SSD of the model reviewed in the aforementioned article. The other thing I could do without is Windows 8 — given the choice, I'd rather have Windows 7 preinstalled than have to nuke the preinstalled OS and waste a license. Dual-booting seems like the best option for maximum utility.
So I picked up an older Zenbook model with a 2nd
generation Core i3 processor, the UX32A-DB31
. The vendor that Amazon sourced it from, PENS, is geographically very close, so it arrived quickly even with Super Saver shipping. The price seems to have dropped a little bit since my order, so get 'em while they're hot. Comparable models shouldn't cost too much more.
I also ordered some extra memory, since the system only comes with 4 GB of RAM. Sadly, 2 GB are soldered directly to the motherboard, so you can only replace a single stick. I picked up an 8 GB stick of Corsair Vengeance
performance RAM. Installation required a Torx T5 bit, acquired on the cheap at the local discount tool store. If you do this, be sure to keep a little cup handy for the 12 screws you'll need to put back when you're done. Replacing the RAM is a simple but tedious procedure. I wound up not transferring the heat spreader from the old SODIMM because the new RAM already had heat spreaders preinstalled. Windows Experience sub-score for memory jumped from 5.8 to 7.2 — and more importantly, things feel subjectively faster. The OCD part of me feels a little strange about having 10 GB of RAM, though, since it isn't a power-of-2.
Since there's no built-in ethernet port, I picked up these accessories
(although it turns out the ultrabook comes with a micro-VGA adapter already, so now there's a spare).
I'm still setting things up, but I've already got Ubuntu 13.04 installed as a secondary OS, with developer tools installed on both operating systems. Netbeans, IntelliJ community edition, MIT Scheme, etc. Sadly, the Ubuntu packages for Grails that I mentioned in a previous post don't seem to work well on the latest release, so it appears a completely manual install is required. Current Mood: pleased
|Wednesday, July 10th, 2013|
|Grails stuff that pleases me greatly
Now that I'm getting to work with more recent versions of Grails, I've been investigating a few things to make my life easier down the road.
First off, it turns out that there are some great Ubuntu packages for Grails
which obviate much of the annoyance of setting it up and working with it. (They even have a package to provide bash completions for the Grails commands.) Since I'm going to be setting up an Ultrabook soon, I planned on dual-booting Linux; this makes me want to use Ubuntu rather than, say, Linux Mint.
I also finally noticed the new Pivotal
initiative that the Spring and Grails communities are part of. While reading up on what this means to me
as a Grails developer, I saw the following:
Grails 3.0 will separate Grails from the traditional application server and extend Grails’ reach to allow for the development of lightweight, asynchronous applications. Grails’ persistence technology GORM has also been evolving beyond the traditional relational database, with implementations for NoSQL databases now available. GORM will continue to be an important technology for us as enterprise data fabrics evolve.
I'm pleased to see this, because NoSQL data stores are becoming more important (despite some disillusionment in certain quarters), and while JDBC provides a good-to-excellent abstraction for relational databases, it can't really be adapted to non-relational data stores. It's also pretty heavily tied to SQL and SQL datatypes. GORM
provides a much higher level of abstraction. I do wonder, though, if they'll rename GORM since it will abstract both relational and non-relational data — it wouldn't be the Grails Object Relational
I imagine a lot of admins are going to push back on Grails 3.0 deployments just because they are familiar with their existing app servers like Tomcat, JBoss, etc. (Some folks at Apollo Group didn't like deploying Mule as a stand-alone ESB instead of a WAR inside a JBoss instance, for instance. Lack of familiarity breeds distrust, though I suspect lack of technical acumen on the part of their production deployment team played a role.) Current Mood: excited
|Sunday, June 30th, 2013|
|Yay! New router firmware!
I installed the latest firmware for my Asus RT-N56U, and all seems to be going mostly well. The thing seems generally snappier, the web-based UI is much more refined, and long-running TCP connections don't seem to be choking/seizing/timing out on me.
Took me a while to get it talking to my computers again last night because this firmware update required resetting the router to factory defaults (one of the reasons I didn't want to make the switch to the new 3-series firmware). The promise of functional IPv6 was enough to win me over, and I knew having bittorrent capabilities built into the router that no longer required a Windows client application to use would sweeten the deal.
Well, the UI improvements and performance improvements make me pretty happy, but I'm not terribly excited about IPv6 so far — because it's not working. Oh, I've got the router assigning IPv6 addresses via DHCP, but I am not sure if I have it talking to the Qwest Q1000 modem correctly. So far, I am using 6rd tunneling, which seems to get me results that other options on the router don't. I did
enable IPv6 on the Qwest modem per the instructions at this page
Anyone have any ideas to get my router properly talking IPv6 to the Q1000? Current Mood: accomplished
|Thursday, February 14th, 2013|
|Finally getting non-Gmail e-mail accounts to sync on the HTC One X+
Having recently upgraded from the HTC Inspire 4G to the HTC One X+, I have noticed two annoying things:
- The bluetooth seems to over-amplify the voice of the person I'm calling, if I'm the one originating the call. (It seems to do the same thing when I'm receiving the call, but that's a more rare case so I'm not as certain of it.) Reports around the 'net indicate that this is a known issue, and will probably be addressed by a Jelly Bean update (whenever AT&T gets around to passing that along) and/or an HTC update. Apparently, the gain is getting set higher than it should, causing clipping and distortion. The problem isn't the showstopper that some folks make it out to be, though, so I'm not returning the phone. This was tested with my Nissan Juke.
- The Mail app (not the Gmail-specific app, but the other one that ships on this phone — not sure if this is a Jelly Bean app or something HTC developed) wasn't syncing, so I only found out if there were new messages when I manually launched the app.
It turns out that the second item was something I could fix. The trick is to not set up or edit your e-mail account details from within the Mail app. Instead, you need to go into the Android Settings app, drill down into Accounts & Sync, and add an account specific to that app. Almost every setting is available from here, and what's more, this ensures that you get the sync behavior you expect, with mail being checked at your requested interval. Resist the temptation to use the settings from within Mail, or Mail (and the account you just set up with it) will suddenly disappear from the list of accounts to sync as shown in Android Settings. Current Mood: accomplished
|Hot Topic finally responds
I finally received an e-mail from Hot Topic regarding the problems I'd had with the Deluxe Edition of In This Moment's album, Blood
. As I recently wrote
, there was supposed to be a bonus track on disc 1, specifically a cover of the Nine Inch Nails song “Closer.” (I had even thought that perhaps the bonus track was simply appended to the last track after a silent gap, but no dice... that track is too short to contain two songs.)
Hot Topic finally responded, saying that there was indeed a mistake made:
Thank you for emialing us at Hottopic.com! I am so very sorry but this is what we recieved from the band
Sadly the bonus track of the NIN cover of "Closer" was left off our Hot Topic Deluxe Version of "Blood"
To fix this, we've setup a special site you can go and download the track at.
Please go to the link below to download the tack.
or you can send an email to BLOOD@CENTURYMEDIA.COM with your mailing address and we will mail you out a CD single of "Closer".
Well, I already spent money for the bonus track on iTunes (which they indeed did include in their version of the Deluxe Edition — so much for Hot Topic exclusivity), so I don't need to grab this, but someone else might find this useful. Current Mood: disappointed
|Sunday, February 3rd, 2013|
So I've been listening to In This Moment a lot lately on XM's Octane channel, and liked their music enough that when I saw the exclusive deluxe edition of Blood
on sale at Hot Topic, I decided to pick it up. (Krissy
had some coupons that were about to expire anyway, so it seemed like a good time to use 'em.) One of the advertised benefits of the deluxe edition is the inclusion of a second bonus disc, as well as a cover of the Nine Inch Nails song “Closer.”
Now, the wrapper on the product as sold at Hot Topic had a sticker proclaiming this, and the sleeve around the jewel case also clearly states that track 15 on the album is the bonus track, “Closer.” The band's official website
also clearly states that this song is included in the deluxe edition, exclusively available through Hot Topic. So you would think that there would be no confusion that buying this deluxe edition of Blood
would result in obtaining this sought-after track...
But no, if you remove the CD jewel case from the sleeve, you see that the track listing on the jewel case insert only lists 14 tracks. The bonus CD is there, but it only has the promised 4 tracks, none of which is “Closer.” Confusingly, some press outlets such as Loudwire
and Brave Words & Bloody Knuckles
mention this bonus track as being on disc 2. It isn't.
I'll tell you where it is, though. On iTunes… for an additional $1.29. Oddly enough, it wasn't until I tried to rip the two CDs that I discovered the rip-off. Maybe this is an oversight, but shockingly I have seen no complaints about this anywhere on the Web. Current Mood: aggravated